7105.0.55.003 - National Agricultural Statistics Review

7105.0.55.003 - National Agricultural Statistics Review - Preliminary findings, 2013-14

ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 31/03/2014 First Issue

Page tools: Print Page Print All
Contents Preface Executive summary Introduction Methods The National Agricultural Statistical Information System (NASIS) + Analysis of stakeholder contributions to the NASR Public submission process outcomes Enduring goals for Australian agriculture and supporting data themes Agricultural statistical assets underpinning the enduring goals + Stakeholder information needs What are the priority information needs of stakeholders? Priority information needs relating to the enduring goals How well are these information needs being met? Needs met ratings given by stakeholders for specific statistical assets Importance versus needs met ratings for specific statistical assets Ratings distributed by enduring goal Why information needs are not met Duplication + Efficiencies identified in the NASIS + Discussion + Next steps Have your say – improve Australia’s agricultural statistics (Media Release) About this Release	Needs met ratings given by stakeholders for specific statistical assets Stakeholders were asked to provide subjective ratings of how well each asset they were using met their needs for informing a particular enduring goal. The ‘Need met’ rating (N) was a rating for each statistical asset on a scale from 1 to 5 where the need was: · Fully met = 5 · Mostly met = 4 · Partly met = 3 · Barely met = 2 · Not met = 1 Of the assets that were given a rating by stakeholders through public submissions, 66% of assets were rated as having mostly or fully met their needs. However, 34% of statistical assets were rated as either not, barely or partly meeting their needs. Stakeholders from the Department of Agriculture including ABARES also provided subjective ratings of the extent to which their needs were being met. Nearly 90% of the existing statistical assets used by the Department of Agriculture including ABARES, mostly or fully met their needs. Where a rating was not provided, the statistical asset was removed from this phase of the analysis. Document Selection These documents will be presented in a new window.